IPC 95 vs BNS 95 – Acts Done in Good Faith Without Intention to Cause Death

Comparison
Same

Indian Penal Code (IPC)

VS.

Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Section: IPC 95

Act done in good faith, for the benefit of a person incapable of giving consent, not intended to cause death

About IPC Section

Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, provides legal protection for acts done in good faith for the benefit of a person incapable of giving consent, even if the act may cause harm, provided there is no intention to cause death. This section ensures that individuals acting responsibly and for the welfare of others are not criminally liable.

Key aspects of IPC 95 include:

  • The act must be done in good faith,

  • The person affected must be incapable of giving valid consent, such as a minor or a person of unsound mind,

  • The act must not be intended to cause death,

  • Acts are protected if they are performed for the benefit of the person, such as medical care or necessary interventions.

For example, administering medical treatment to a child or mentally incapacitated individual that carries some risk is protected under IPC 95, as long as the intent is to benefit and not harm.

IPC 95 emphasizes necessity, good faith, and protection of vulnerable individuals, ensuring that criminal liability is not imposed for acts performed responsibly for the welfare of others. It reinforces ethical responsibility while safeguarding legal accountability.

Section: BNS 95

Act done in good faith, for the benefit of a person incapable of giving consent, not intended to cause death

About BNS Section

Section 95 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, mirrors IPC 95, continuing to protect acts performed in good faith for the benefit of individuals incapable of giving consent, provided the act is not intended to cause death.

Under BNS 95:

  • The act must be done in good faith,

  • The person must be unable to provide valid consent,

  • There must be no intention to cause death,

  • Protection applies to actions like medical treatment, care, and other necessary interventions for welfare.

For instance, emergency medical aid to a minor or mentally incapacitated person that carries potential risk, but is performed with the intent to benefit and not harm, is protected under BNS 95. This provision ensures legal safeguard, fairness, and protection of vulnerable individuals.

By retaining IPC 95’s principles, BNS 95 emphasizes good faith, intent to benefit, and protection of those unable to consent, ensuring responsible action is legally recognized and safeguarded.