IPC 173 vs BNS 173 – Public Servant Fabricating Records

Comparison
Same

Indian Penal Code (IPC)

VS.

Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

Section: IPC 173

Public servant fabricating records

About IPC Section

Section 173 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, deals with the offence of a public servant fabricating or manipulating official records with intent to cause injury. This provision ensures the authenticity and integrity of records maintained by public officials.

Key points of IPC 173:

  • Applies when a public servant knowingly fabricates, alters, or manipulates official records.

  • Includes administrative, judicial, or financial records.

  • Punishment: imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both.

For example, if a government clerk intentionally alters property records to favor a party or misrepresent facts, it is punishable under IPC 173.

This section safeguards administrative transparency and fairness, ensuring that official records cannot be tampered with to harm individuals or manipulate outcomes.

Section: BNS 173

Public servant fabricating records

About BNS Section

Section 173 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, mirrors IPC 173. It penalizes public servants who fabricate or manipulate official records, reinforcing integrity and accountability in public service.

Key points of BNS 173:

  • Covers fabrication, alteration, or falsification of official documents or records.

  • Punishment: up to 2 years imprisonment, or fine, or both.

  • Ensures that public officials cannot manipulate records for personal or third-party benefit.

For instance, a municipal officer falsifying inspection reports to favor a business can be prosecuted under BNS 173.

This provision strengthens public trust in government processes, deterring officials from engaging in misconduct that compromises fairness and legality.